Is Unibase a scam?
EXTREME RISK · 70/100Unibase (UB) has an automated risk score of 70/100 — extreme risk. Unibase has highly concentrated ownership: On-chain: the top 10 holders control 80.2% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — at this level a few wallets hold enough supply to move the price on their own. That is a measurement of who holds the supply, not a finding about how any holder has acted or will act. 25.0% circulating (~75% off-market) — a large share is still to be released. Down 46% from its all-time high — within normal speculative range.
Automated assessment · updated 22 October 2026
Unibase
ubEXTREME$0.1316
+2.60% (24h)
updating live price…
Risk Assessment
Risk Score
EXTREME RISK
Driven primarily by on-chain holder concentration (22 of 22 points). Every contributing factor is itemised below.
measured 2026-10-22 · 7 factors evaluated
Here is what the public data shows about Unibase, ordered by how strongly each factor contributes to the score:
- On-Chain Holder Concentration: On-chain: the top 10 holders control 80.2% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — at this level a few wallets hold enough supply to move the price on their own.
- Supply Structure: 25.0% circulating (~75% off-market) — a large share is still to be released.
- Drawdown From All-Time High: Down 46% from its all-time high — within normal speculative range.
- Volume Anomaly: Volume at 3.3% of market cap — within normal range.
These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public data — not financial advice or an allegation of wrongdoing. See our methodology.
Why this asset is flagged as high-risk
The patterns below are automated, opinion-based observations from public market data. They describe statistical risk indicators — not proof of wrongdoing by any project or person.
A small share of total supply is circulating (estimated from reported supply figures, not from holder data). The price is set by that small share
Verified on-chain: after excluding burn and labelled exchange, staking and liquidity wallets (team/vesting contracts are counted), the top 10 holders control more than half of the supply. At that level ten wallets hold enough supply to move the price on their own; this measures holdings, not conduct
Risk Factor Breakdown
Each factor is scored independently and weighted to calculate the total risk score.
Drawdown From All-Time High
Price Action
2/25
8%
How far the price sits below its peak. Deep drawdowns are common to abandoned and post-collapse tokens, but also to assets in a prolonged bear market — on its own this measures price history, not conduct.
Volume Anomaly
Trading Signals
1/20
5%
24-hour volume compared with market cap. Very high turnover can reflect genuine news-driven trading or inflated volume; very low turnover means the price is rarely tested. We measure the ratio and cannot attribute it to any party.
Supply Structure
Tokenomics
11/20
55%
Free float (circulating vs total/max supply). A low float means much of the supply has yet to reach the market, so the price is set by a small share of it and future releases could dilute holders. Estimated from reported supply; holder data read from the chain is scored separately.
On-Chain Holder Concentration
Tokenomics
22/22
100%
Verified holder data. Burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and LP wallets are excluded; unlabelled contracts (often team/vesting multisigs) are counted. Above the flag threshold, ten wallets hold enough supply to move the price on their own.
Not contributing (3): Market Cap Risk, Price Volatility, Transparency Gaps — 0 points.
Key Metrics
Protect Yourself
- • Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely
- • Check token concentration — if top 10 wallets hold >50%, be cautious
- • Verify the team is public and doxxed
- • Read the smart contract audit before buying
- • Be wary of unrealistic APY promises
Embed Risk Badge
Writing about this coin? Embed our risk badge — it updates automatically with each scan.
Community Comments
Loading comments…
What the contract allows
Ethereum · measured 2026-10-18
We checked Unibase’s deployed contract for all 7 owner privileges below and found none of them. This describes the code only — it says nothing about the team, the treasury, or how the supply is distributed.
Checked and not present: change any wallet balance, pause all transfers, blacklist wallets, mint new tokens, ownership can be reclaimed after renouncing, contract has a hidden owner, contract can self-destruct.
Source code: published and verified, so the deployed bytecode can be independently reviewed.
Contract analysis from GoPlus Labs · verify on-chain. An upgradeable contract can change after this reading.
How we counted holders here
Ten largest wallets
99.9%
including custodial
Largest private wallets
80.2%
after excluding 2
2 of Unibase’s ten largest holders are labelled exchange, market-maker, treasury or vesting, liquidity-pool or DeFi-protocol, staking or vault, bridge, multisig or burn addresses — supply that is custodied, pooled or destroyed rather than sitting in one person’s wallet. Separating them out moves the top-10 figure by 19.7 points. We report the private-wallet figure because that is the supply someone can actually choose to sell today.
Wallets excluded from the top 10
| Address | Classified as | Label | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0xafc3…7c35 | Bridge contract | UBOFTAdapter · UBOFTAdapter · UBOFTAdapter | 19.45% |
| 0xdd27…3cb0 | Exchange wallet | KuCoin 65 · KuCoin 65 · Exchange · ERC1967Proxy | 0.28% |
Classification applied to the 100 holder records returned for this contract; 90 remained after exclusions · measured 2026-10-22. Custodial wallets are identified by public address labels, so an unlabelled one may still be counted as private — this correction is a floor, not a guarantee.
Unibase holder-concentration history
17 dated measurements · -19.7 pts over the period
FraudCoins.com has measured the share of Unibase’s supply held by its top 10 non-exchange wallets on 17 days since 18 Jul 2026. The highest reading was 99.9% on 18 Jul 2026; the most recent reading is 80.2% on 22 Oct 2026.
- 10 Oct 2026: Ethereum and Optimism holder lists and wallet labels moved from Moralis to Blockscout, which identifies more exchange, bridge, treasury and vesting wallets.
- 12 Oct 2026: Added contract-type rules (lock-ups, vaults, lending and yield protocols), excluded vault and yield-bearing receipt tokens, and stopped flagging assets where the measured chain holds only part of the supply.
Composite risk score (0–100)
Recorded measurements (17)
| Date measured | Top 10 hold | Flagged |
|---|---|---|
| 80.2% | Yes | |
| 80.2% | Yes | |
| 80.2% | Yes | |
| 80.2% | Yes | |
| 80.2% | Yes | |
| 80.2% | Yes | |
| 80.2% | Yes | |
| 80.2% | Yes | |
| 80.2% | Yes | |
| 80.2% | Yes | |
| 80.2% | Yes | |
| 80.2% | Yes |
Each row is an automated measurement taken on the date shown, using public on-chain holder data with burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets excluded. Historical readings describe what our model measured on that date — they are not statements about the project’s conduct then or now, and are not financial advice.
Track Unibase and 1,700+ other assets
One email when any coin newly crosses our 50% top-10 holder-concentration threshold. No account needed.
Confirmed opt-in, unsubscribe in one click. We don’t sell your data — see our privacy policy.
Frequently asked questions about Unibase
Is Unibase a scam?
We do not allege that Unibase (UB) is a scam, and we have no evidence of wrongdoing by anyone associated with it. What we can tell you is what we measured: Its ten largest private wallets hold 80.2% of supply (exchange, staking, bridge and burn addresses excluded). That places it at 70/100 on our automated scale, which we label extreme risk. A high score means the asset has structural characteristics that have historically preceded losses — not that fraud has occurred. These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public market and on-chain data — not statements of fact, financial advice, or allegations of wrongdoing.
Why is Unibase flagged as extreme risk?
Unibase's risk score is driven mainly by: on-chain holder concentration — On-chain: the top 10 holders control 80.2% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — at this level a few wallets hold enough supply to move the price on their own; supply structure — 25.0% circulating (~75% off-market) — a large share is still to be released; drawdown from all-time high — Down 46% from its all-time high — within normal speculative range.
Who controls Unibase's supply?
On-chain data shows the top 10 holders of Unibase control 80.2% of the supply, after excluding burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets. At that level ten wallets hold enough supply to move the price on their own. This measures holdings, not how any holder has acted.
Is Unibase safe to buy?
FraudCoins.com does not give buy or sell recommendations, and no cryptocurrency is safe. Unibase scores 70/100 (extreme risk) on our automated risk model. Always do your own research and never invest more than you can afford to lose.