Is Sierra [OLD] a scam?
LOW RISK · 18/100Sierra [OLD] (SIERRA) has an automated risk score of 18/100 — low risk. No single factor dominates Sierra [OLD]'s assessment — the score reflects several converging measurements. Market cap under $100K — at this size a single modest trade can move the price sharply. Down 13% from its all-time high — within normal speculative range.
Automated assessment · updated 28 July 2026
![Sierra [OLD]](https://coin-images.coingecko.com/coins/images/70247/large/Sierra_Icon-Light_%281%29.png?1761242537){kind=icon}
Sierra [OLD]
sierraLOW RISK$1.037
0.00% (24h)
updating live price…
Risk Assessment
Risk Score
LOW RISK
Driven primarily by market cap risk (15 of 15 points). Every contributing factor is itemised below.
measured 2026-07-28 · 6 factors evaluated
Here is what the public data shows about Sierra [OLD], ordered by how strongly each factor contributes to the score:
- Market Cap Risk: Market cap under $100K — at this size a single modest trade can move the price sharply.
- Drawdown From All-Time High: Down 13% from its all-time high — within normal speculative range.
- Volume Anomaly: Volume at 0.0% of market cap — within normal range.
These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public data — not financial advice or an allegation of wrongdoing. See our methodology.
Risk Factor Breakdown
Each factor is scored independently and weighted to calculate the total risk score.
Drawdown From All-Time High
Price Action
2/25
8%
How far the price sits below its peak. Deep drawdowns are common to abandoned and post-collapse tokens, but also to assets in a prolonged bear market — on its own this measures price history, not conduct.
Volume Anomaly
Trading Signals
1/20
5%
24-hour volume compared with market cap. Very high turnover can reflect genuine news-driven trading or inflated volume; very low turnover means the price is rarely tested. We measure the ratio and cannot attribute it to any party.
Market Cap Risk
Market Structure
15/15
100%
Market capitalisation. The smaller the asset, the less capital it takes to move its price.
Not contributing (3): Supply Structure, Price Volatility, Transparency Gaps — 0 points.
Key Metrics
Protect Yourself
- • Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely
- • Check token concentration — if top 10 wallets hold >50%, be cautious
- • Verify the team is public and doxxed
- • Read the smart contract audit before buying
- • Be wary of unrealistic APY promises
Embed Risk Badge
Writing about this coin? Embed our risk badge — it updates automatically with each scan.
Community Comments
Loading comments…
What the contract allows
Ethereum · measured 2026-10-18
We checked Sierra [OLD]’s deployed contract for all 7 owner privileges below and found none of them. This describes the code only — it says nothing about the team, the treasury, or how the supply is distributed.
Checked and not present: change any wallet balance, pause all transfers, blacklist wallets, mint new tokens, ownership can be reclaimed after renouncing, contract has a hidden owner, contract can self-destruct.
Source code: published and verified, so the deployed bytecode can be independently reviewed.
Contract analysis from GoPlus Labs · verify on-chain. An upgradeable contract can change after this reading.
Sierra [OLD] holder-concentration history
7 dated measurements · -8.8 pts over the period
FraudCoins.com has measured the share of Sierra [OLD]’s supply held by its top 10 non-exchange wallets on 7 days since 18 Jul 2026. The highest reading was 92.4% on 22 Jul 2026; the most recent reading is 79.4% on 28 Jul 2026.
Composite risk score (0–100)
Recorded measurements (7)
| Date measured | Top 10 hold | Flagged |
|---|---|---|
| 79.4% | Yes | |
| 89.6% | Yes | |
| 89.5% | Yes | |
| 89.7% | Yes | |
| 92.4% | Yes | |
| 88.1% | Yes | |
| 88.2% | Yes |
Each row is an automated measurement taken on the date shown, using public on-chain holder data with burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets excluded. Historical readings describe what our model measured on that date — they are not statements about the project’s conduct then or now, and are not financial advice.
Track Sierra [OLD] and 1,700+ other assets
One email when any coin newly crosses our 50% top-10 holder-concentration threshold. No account needed.
Confirmed opt-in, unsubscribe in one click. We don’t sell your data — see our privacy policy.
Frequently asked questions about Sierra [OLD]
Is Sierra [OLD] a scam?
We do not allege that Sierra [OLD] (SIERRA) is a scam, and we have no evidence of wrongdoing by anyone associated with it. What we can tell you is what we measured: Its ten largest private wallets hold 79.4% of supply (exchange, staking, bridge and burn addresses excluded). That places it at 18/100 on our automated scale, which we label low risk. A high score means the asset has structural characteristics that have historically preceded losses — not that fraud has occurred. These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public market and on-chain data — not statements of fact, financial advice, or allegations of wrongdoing.
Why is Sierra [OLD] flagged as low risk?
Sierra [OLD]'s risk score is driven mainly by: market cap risk — Market cap under $100K — at this size a single modest trade can move the price sharply; drawdown from all-time high — Down 13% from its all-time high — within normal speculative range; volume anomaly — Volume at 0.0% of market cap — within normal range.
Who controls Sierra [OLD]'s supply?
On-chain data shows the top 10 holders of Sierra [OLD] control 79.4% of the supply, after excluding burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets. At that level ten wallets hold enough supply to move the price on their own. This measures holdings, not how any holder has acted.
Is Sierra [OLD] safe to buy?
FraudCoins.com does not give buy or sell recommendations, and no cryptocurrency is safe. Sierra [OLD] scores 18/100 (low risk) on our automated risk model. Always do your own research and never invest more than you can afford to lose.