Is Rootstock Infrastructure Framework a scam?
LOW RISK · 18/100Rootstock Infrastructure Framework (RIF) has an automated risk score of 18/100 — low risk. No single factor dominates Rootstock Infrastructure Framework's assessment — the score reflects several converging measurements. Down 84% from its all-time high — a major sustained decline. Market cap under $100M — mid-sized; large trades can still move the price.
Automated assessment · updated 22 October 2026
Rootstock Infrastructure Framework
rifLOW RISK$0.0737
-2.61% (24h)
updating live price…
Risk Assessment
Risk Score
LOW RISK
Driven primarily by drawdown from all-time high (14 of 25 points). Every contributing factor is itemised below.
measured 2026-10-22 · 7 factors evaluated
Here is what the public data shows about Rootstock Infrastructure Framework, ordered by how strongly each factor contributes to the score:
- Drawdown From All-Time High: Down 84% from its all-time high — a major sustained decline.
- Market Cap Risk: Market cap under $100M — mid-sized; large trades can still move the price.
- Volume Anomaly: Volume at 9.9% of market cap — within normal range.
These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public data — not financial advice or an allegation of wrongdoing. See our methodology.
Risk Factor Breakdown
Each factor is scored independently and weighted to calculate the total risk score.
Drawdown From All-Time High
Price Action
14/25
56%
How far the price sits below its peak. Deep drawdowns are common to abandoned and post-collapse tokens, but also to assets in a prolonged bear market — on its own this measures price history, not conduct.
Volume Anomaly
Trading Signals
1/20
5%
24-hour volume compared with market cap. Very high turnover can reflect genuine news-driven trading or inflated volume; very low turnover means the price is rarely tested. We measure the ratio and cannot attribute it to any party.
Market Cap Risk
Market Structure
3/15
20%
Market capitalisation. The smaller the asset, the less capital it takes to move its price.
Not contributing (4): Supply Structure, Price Volatility, On-Chain Holder Concentration, Transparency Gaps — 0 points.
Key Metrics
Protect Yourself
- • Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely
- • Check token concentration — if top 10 wallets hold >50%, be cautious
- • Verify the team is public and doxxed
- • Read the smart contract audit before buying
- • Be wary of unrealistic APY promises
Embed Risk Badge
Writing about this coin? Embed our risk badge — it updates automatically with each scan.
Community Comments
Loading comments…
What the contract allows
Ethereum · measured 2026-10-19
We checked Rootstock Infrastructure Framework’s deployed contract for all 7 owner privileges below and found none of them. This describes the code only — it says nothing about the team, the treasury, or how the supply is distributed.
Checked and not present: change any wallet balance, pause all transfers, blacklist wallets, mint new tokens, ownership can be reclaimed after renouncing, contract has a hidden owner, contract can self-destruct.
Source code: published and verified, so the deployed bytecode can be independently reviewed.
Contract analysis from GoPlus Labs · verify on-chain. An upgradeable contract can change after this reading.
How we counted holders here
Ten largest wallets
97.8%
including custodial
Largest private wallets
35.3%
after excluding 1
1 of Rootstock Infrastructure Framework’s ten largest holders is a labelled exchange, market-maker, treasury or vesting, liquidity-pool or DeFi-protocol, staking or vault, bridge, multisig or burn address — supply that is custodied, pooled or destroyed rather than sitting in one person’s wallet. Separating it out moves the top-10 figure by 62.5 points. We report the private-wallet figure because that is the supply someone can actually choose to sell today.
Most of Rootstock Infrastructure Framework’s supply therefore sits in the excluded addresses. Burned supply is permanently gone, but treasury, vesting and foundation holdings are excluded too, and those can still reach the market when they unlock — a low private-wallet figure is not the same as a low future sell-side risk.
Wallets excluded from the top 10
| Address | Classified as | Label | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0x0000…8a90 | Liquidity pool or DeFi protocol contract | Uniswap · Uniswap V4: Pool Manager · Liquidity Pool · DEX · Uniswap V4 | 62.55% |
Classification applied to the 83 holder records returned for this contract; 82 remained after exclusions · measured 2026-10-22. Custodial wallets are identified by public address labels, so an unlabelled one may still be counted as private — this correction is a floor, not a guarantee.
Rootstock Infrastructure Framework holder-concentration history
19 dated measurements · +23.5 pts over the period
FraudCoins.com has measured the share of Rootstock Infrastructure Framework’s supply held by its top 10 non-exchange wallets on 19 days since 18 Jul 2026. The highest reading was 37.4% on 10 Oct 2026; the most recent reading is 35.3% on 22 Oct 2026.
- 10 Oct 2026: Ethereum and Optimism holder lists and wallet labels moved from Moralis to Blockscout, which identifies more exchange, bridge, treasury and vesting wallets.
- 12 Oct 2026: Added contract-type rules (lock-ups, vaults, lending and yield protocols), excluded vault and yield-bearing receipt tokens, and stopped flagging assets where the measured chain holds only part of the supply.
Composite risk score (0–100)
Recorded measurements (19)
| Date measured | Top 10 hold | Flagged |
|---|---|---|
| 35.3% | No | |
| 35.3% | No | |
| 37.4% | No | |
| 37.4% | No | |
| 37.4% | No | |
| 37.4% | No | |
| 37.4% | No | |
| 37.4% | No | |
| 37.4% | No | |
| 37.4% | No | |
| 37.4% | No | |
| 37.4% | No |
Each row is an automated measurement taken on the date shown, using public on-chain holder data with burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets excluded. Historical readings describe what our model measured on that date — they are not statements about the project’s conduct then or now, and are not financial advice.
Track Rootstock Infrastructure Framework and 1,700+ other assets
One email when any coin newly crosses our 50% top-10 holder-concentration threshold. No account needed.
Confirmed opt-in, unsubscribe in one click. We don’t sell your data — see our privacy policy.
Frequently asked questions about Rootstock Infrastructure Framework
Is Rootstock Infrastructure Framework a scam?
We do not allege that Rootstock Infrastructure Framework (RIF) is a scam, and we have no evidence of wrongdoing by anyone associated with it. What we can tell you is what we measured: Its ten largest private wallets hold 35.3% of supply (exchange, staking, bridge and burn addresses excluded). That places it at 18/100 on our automated scale, which we label low risk. A high score means the asset has structural characteristics that have historically preceded losses — not that fraud has occurred. These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public market and on-chain data — not statements of fact, financial advice, or allegations of wrongdoing.
Why is Rootstock Infrastructure Framework flagged as low risk?
Rootstock Infrastructure Framework's risk score is driven mainly by: drawdown from all-time high — Down 84% from its all-time high — a major sustained decline; market cap risk — Market cap under $100M — mid-sized; large trades can still move the price; volume anomaly — Volume at 9.9% of market cap — within normal range.
Who controls Rootstock Infrastructure Framework's supply?
On-chain data shows the top 10 holders of Rootstock Infrastructure Framework hold 35.3% of the supply (burn and labelled exchange, staking and liquidity wallets excluded). This is shown for transparency and sits below our flag threshold.
Is Rootstock Infrastructure Framework safe to buy?
FraudCoins.com does not give buy or sell recommendations, and no cryptocurrency is safe. Rootstock Infrastructure Framework scores 18/100 (low risk) on our automated risk model. Always do your own research and never invest more than you can afford to lose.