FraudCoins.com

Is Pocket Network a scam?

MEDIUM RISK · 36/100

Pocket Network (POKT) has an automated risk score of 36/100 — medium risk. Pocket Network is down more than 99% from its all-time high and is trading with very little liquidity relative to its size. That combination is common to abandoned and post-collapse tokens, but it also describes assets in a prolonged bear market — it is not evidence of any wrongdoing by anyone.

Automated assessment · updated 22 October 2026

Pocket Network

Pocket Network

poktMEDIUM
Deep Drawdown, Thin LiquidityInactive Market

$0.007526

+3.12% (24h)

updating live price…

Risk Assessment

36/100

Risk Score

MEDIUM RISK

Driven primarily by drawdown from all-time high (25 of 25 points). Every contributing factor is itemised below.

measured 2026-10-22 · 7 factors evaluated

Here is what the public data shows about Pocket Network, ordered by how strongly each factor contributes to the score:

  • Drawdown From All-Time High: Down more than 99% from its all-time high — among the deepest drawdowns we measure.
  • Volume Anomaly: Very low volume (1.91% of MCap) — thin trading, so larger positions may be hard to sell near the quoted price.
  • Market Cap Risk: Market cap under $100M — mid-sized; large trades can still move the price.

These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public data — not financial advice or an allegation of wrongdoing. See our methodology.

Why this asset is flagged as high-risk

The patterns below are automated, opinion-based observations from public market data. They describe statistical risk indicators — not proof of wrongdoing by any project or person.

Deep Drawdown, Thin Liquidity

Price is far below its all-time high while trading with very little liquidity — a pattern common to collapsed and dormant tokens, and also to assets in a long bear market

Inactive Market

Very low trading activity relative to size. We measure market data only and do not assess development activity

Risk Factor Breakdown

Each factor is scored independently and weighted to calculate the total risk score.

Drawdown From All-Time High

Price Action

25/25

100%

How far the price sits below its peak. Deep drawdowns are common to abandoned and post-collapse tokens, but also to assets in a prolonged bear market — on its own this measures price history, not conduct.

Finding: Down more than 99% from its all-time high — among the deepest drawdowns we measure

Volume Anomaly

Trading Signals

8/20

40%

24-hour volume compared with market cap. Very high turnover can reflect genuine news-driven trading or inflated volume; very low turnover means the price is rarely tested. We measure the ratio and cannot attribute it to any party.

Finding: Very low volume (1.91% of MCap) — thin trading, so larger positions may be hard to sell near the quoted price

Market Cap Risk

Market Structure

3/15

20%

Market capitalisation. The smaller the asset, the less capital it takes to move its price.

Finding: Market cap under $100M — mid-sized; large trades can still move the price

Not contributing (4): Supply Structure, Price Volatility, On-Chain Holder Concentration, Transparency Gaps — 0 points.

Key Metrics

Market Cap$17.88M
24h Volume$341.24K
Vol / MCap1.9%
All-Time High$3.110
ATH Drop-99.76%
ATH Date4 years ago
Circulating Supply2.38B
Total Supply2.38B
Max SupplyN/A
7d Change—
30d Change—

Protect Yourself

  • • Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely
  • • Check token concentration — if top 10 wallets hold >50%, be cautious
  • • Verify the team is public and doxxed
  • • Read the smart contract audit before buying
  • • Be wary of unrealistic APY promises
Full Guide: How to Spot Scams →

Embed Risk Badge

Writing about this coin? Embed our risk badge — it updates automatically with each scan.

FraudCoins risk badge preview

Community Comments

Be respectful. Comments are public and reflect users’ own opinions, not FraudCoins.

Loading comments…

What the contract allows

Ethereum · measured 2026-10-21

Our contract source did not report on any of the 7 owner privileges we check for. What it did return for Pocket Network is below — treat the unreported checks as unknown, not as absent.

  • Contract is upgradeable (proxy)

    The logic behind this token can be replaced after deployment. This is a standard pattern used by many established protocols; it means a review of today’s code does not bind tomorrow’s.

Not answered by our source: change any wallet balance, pause all transfers, blacklist wallets, mint new tokens, ownership can be reclaimed after renouncing, contract has a hidden owner, contract can self-destruct. Treat these as unknown, not as absent.

Source code: published and verified, so the deployed bytecode can be independently reviewed.

Contract analysis from GoPlus Labs · verify on-chain. An upgradeable contract can change after this reading.

How we counted holders here

Ten largest wallets

97.3%

including custodial

Largest private wallets

14.0%

after excluding 2

2 of Pocket Network’s ten largest holders are labelled exchange, market-maker, treasury or vesting, liquidity-pool or DeFi-protocol, staking or vault, bridge, multisig or burn addresses — supply that is custodied, pooled or destroyed rather than sitting in one person’s wallet. Separating them out moves the top-10 figure by 83.3 points. We report the private-wallet figure because that is the supply someone can actually choose to sell today.

Most of Pocket Network’s supply therefore sits in the excluded addresses. Burned supply is permanently gone, but treasury, vesting and foundation holdings are excluded too, and those can still reach the market when they unlock — a low private-wallet figure is not the same as a low future sell-side risk.

Wallets excluded from the top 10

AddressClassified asLabelShare
0x3ee1…a585Bridge contractWormhole · Wormhole: Token Bridge · Bridge · Wormhole · TokenBridge80.33%
0x0000…8a90Liquidity pool or DeFi protocol contractUniswap · Uniswap V4: Pool Manager · Liquidity Pool · DEX · Uniswap V43.47%

Classification applied to the 100 holder records returned for this contract; 94 remained after exclusions · measured 2026-10-22. Custodial wallets are identified by public address labels, so an unlabelled one may still be counted as private — this correction is a floor, not a guarantee.

Pocket Network holder-concentration history

2 dated measurements · -0.6 pts over the period

FraudCoins.com has measured the share of Pocket Network’s supply held by its top 10 non-exchange wallets on 2 days since 11 Oct 2026. The highest reading was 14.6% on 11 Oct 2026; the most recent reading is 14% on 22 Oct 2026.

10050050% flag threshold2026-10-112026-10-22

Composite risk score (0–100)

1005002026-07-302026-10-22
Recorded measurements (2)
Dated top-10 holder concentration readings for Pocket Network
Date measuredTop 10 holdFlagged
14%No
14.6%No

Each row is an automated measurement taken on the date shown, using public on-chain holder data with burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets excluded. Historical readings describe what our model measured on that date — they are not statements about the project’s conduct then or now, and are not financial advice.

Track Pocket Network and 1,700+ other assets

One email when any coin newly crosses our 50% top-10 holder-concentration threshold. No account needed.

Confirmed opt-in, unsubscribe in one click. We don’t sell your data — see our privacy policy.

Frequently asked questions about Pocket Network

Is Pocket Network a scam?

We do not allege that Pocket Network (POKT) is a scam, and we have no evidence of wrongdoing by anyone associated with it. What we can tell you is what we measured: Its ten largest private wallets hold 14% of supply (exchange, staking, bridge and burn addresses excluded). That places it at 36/100 on our automated scale, which we label medium risk. A high score means the asset has structural characteristics that have historically preceded losses — not that fraud has occurred. These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public market and on-chain data — not statements of fact, financial advice, or allegations of wrongdoing.

Why is Pocket Network flagged as medium risk?

Pocket Network's risk score is driven mainly by: drawdown from all-time high — Down more than 99% from its all-time high — among the deepest drawdowns we measure; volume anomaly — Very low volume (1.91% of MCap) — thin trading, so larger positions may be hard to sell near the quoted price; market cap risk — Market cap under $100M — mid-sized; large trades can still move the price.

Who controls Pocket Network's supply?

On-chain data shows the top 10 holders of Pocket Network hold 14.0% of the supply (burn and labelled exchange, staking and liquidity wallets excluded). This is shown for transparency and sits below our flag threshold.

Is Pocket Network safe to buy?

FraudCoins.com does not give buy or sell recommendations, and no cryptocurrency is safe. Pocket Network scores 36/100 (medium risk) on our automated risk model. Always do your own research and never invest more than you can afford to lose.

Learn about these risks

Other coins flagged for similar risks