FraudCoins.com

Is NaoX Protocol a scam?

EXTREME RISK · 77/100

NaoX Protocol (NAORIS) has an automated risk score of 77/100 — extreme risk. NaoX Protocol has highly concentrated ownership: On-chain: the top 10 holders control 93.5% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — at this level a few wallets hold enough supply to move the price on their own. That is a measurement of who holds the supply, not a finding about how any holder has acted or will act. Only 15.0% in free float — most of the supply is not yet circulating, so the price is set by a small share of it and future releases could dilute holders. Down 81% from its all-time high — a major sustained decline.

Automated assessment · updated 12 October 2026

NaoX Protocol

NaoX Protocol

naorisEXTREME
Large Unreleased SupplyTop-10 Concentration

$0.0314

-3.06% (24h)

updating live price…

Risk Assessment

77/100

Risk Score

EXTREME RISK

Driven primarily by on-chain holder concentration (22 of 22 points). Every contributing factor is itemised below.

measured 2026-10-12 · 7 factors evaluated

Here is what the public data shows about NaoX Protocol, ordered by how strongly each factor contributes to the score:

  • On-Chain Holder Concentration: On-chain: the top 10 holders control 93.5% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — at this level a few wallets hold enough supply to move the price on their own.
  • Supply Structure: Only 15.0% in free float — most of the supply is not yet circulating, so the price is set by a small share of it and future releases could dilute holders.
  • Drawdown From All-Time High: Down 81% from its all-time high — a major sustained decline.
  • Market Cap Risk: Market cap under $100M — mid-sized; large trades can still move the price.

These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public data — not financial advice or an allegation of wrongdoing. See our methodology.

Why this asset is flagged as high-risk

The patterns below are automated, opinion-based observations from public market data. They describe statistical risk indicators — not proof of wrongdoing by any project or person.

Large Unreleased Supply

Most of the total supply is not yet circulating; future releases would dilute holders if demand does not grow with them

Top-10 Concentration

Verified on-chain: after excluding burn and labelled exchange, staking and liquidity wallets (team/vesting contracts are counted), the top 10 holders control more than half of the supply. At that level ten wallets hold enough supply to move the price on their own; this measures holdings, not conduct

Risk Factor Breakdown

Each factor is scored independently and weighted to calculate the total risk score.

Drawdown From All-Time High

Price Action

14/25

56%

How far the price sits below its peak. Deep drawdowns are common to abandoned and post-collapse tokens, but also to assets in a prolonged bear market — on its own this measures price history, not conduct.

Finding: Down 81% from its all-time high — a major sustained decline

Volume Anomaly

Trading Signals

1/20

5%

24-hour volume compared with market cap. Very high turnover can reflect genuine news-driven trading or inflated volume; very low turnover means the price is rarely tested. We measure the ratio and cannot attribute it to any party.

Finding: Volume at 4.0% of market cap — within normal range

Market Cap Risk

Market Structure

3/15

20%

Market capitalisation. The smaller the asset, the less capital it takes to move its price.

Finding: Market cap under $100M — mid-sized; large trades can still move the price

Supply Structure

Tokenomics

16/20

80%

Free float (circulating vs total/max supply). A low float means much of the supply has yet to reach the market, so the price is set by a small share of it and future releases could dilute holders. Estimated from reported supply; holder data read from the chain is scored separately.

Finding: Only 15.0% in free float — most of the supply is not yet circulating, so the price is set by a small share of it and future releases could dilute holders

On-Chain Holder Concentration

Tokenomics

22/22

100%

Verified holder data. Burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and LP wallets are excluded; unlabelled contracts (often team/vesting multisigs) are counted. Above the flag threshold, ten wallets hold enough supply to move the price on their own.

Finding: On-chain: the top 10 holders control 93.5% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — at this level a few wallets hold enough supply to move the price on their own

Not contributing (2): Price Volatility, Transparency Gaps — 0 points.

Key Metrics

Market Cap$18.84M
24h Volume$759.73K
Vol / MCap4.0%
All-Time High$0.1651
ATH Drop-80.96%
ATH Date5 months ago
Circulating Supply599.26M
Total Supply4.00B
Max Supply4.00B
7d Change—
30d Change—

Protect Yourself

  • • Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely
  • • Check token concentration — if top 10 wallets hold >50%, be cautious
  • • Verify the team is public and doxxed
  • • Read the smart contract audit before buying
  • • Be wary of unrealistic APY promises
Full Guide: How to Spot Scams →

Embed Risk Badge

Writing about this coin? Embed our risk badge — it updates automatically with each scan.

FraudCoins risk badge preview

Community Comments

Be respectful. Comments are public and reflect users’ own opinions, not FraudCoins.

Loading comments…

What the contract allows

Ethereum · measured 2026-10-21

Our contract source did not report on any of the 7 owner privileges we check for. What it did return for NaoX Protocol is below — treat the unreported checks as unknown, not as absent.

  • Contract is upgradeable (proxy)

    The logic behind this token can be replaced after deployment. This is a standard pattern used by many established protocols; it means a review of today’s code does not bind tomorrow’s.

Not answered by our source: change any wallet balance, pause all transfers, blacklist wallets, mint new tokens, ownership can be reclaimed after renouncing, contract has a hidden owner, contract can self-destruct. Treat these as unknown, not as absent.

Source code: published and verified, so the deployed bytecode can be independently reviewed.

Contract analysis from GoPlus Labs · verify on-chain. An upgradeable contract can change after this reading.

How we counted holders here

Ten largest wallets

94.9%

including custodial

Largest private wallets

93.5%

after excluding 1

1 of NaoX Protocol’s ten largest holders is a labelled exchange, market-maker, treasury or vesting, liquidity-pool or DeFi-protocol, staking or vault, bridge, multisig or burn address — supply that is custodied, pooled or destroyed rather than sitting in one person’s wallet. Separating it out moves the top-10 figure by 1.4 points. We report the private-wallet figure because that is the supply someone can actually choose to sell today.

Wallets excluded from the top 10

AddressClassified asLabelShare
0xc882…f071Exchange walletGate.io · Gate.io: Deposit Address · DEPOSIT ADDRESS · Cold Wallet · E1.93%

Classification applied to the 100 holder records returned for this contract; 96 remained after exclusions · measured 2026-10-12. Custodial wallets are identified by public address labels, so an unlabelled one may still be counted as private — this correction is a floor, not a guarantee.

NaoX Protocol holder-concentration history

2 dated measurements · +0 pts over the period

FraudCoins.com has measured the share of NaoX Protocol’s supply held by its top 10 non-exchange wallets on 2 days since 11 Oct 2026. The highest reading was 93.5% on 11 Oct 2026; the most recent reading is 93.5% on 12 Oct 2026.

Method note. How we classify wallets changed during this series. A step on these dates reflects re-classification, not a movement of tokens, so readings before and after are not like-for-like.
  • 12 Oct 2026: Added contract-type rules (lock-ups, vaults, lending and yield protocols), excluded vault and yield-bearing receipt tokens, and stopped flagging assets where the measured chain holds only part of the supply.
10050050% flag threshold2026-10-112026-10-12

Composite risk score (0–100)

1005002026-07-302026-10-22
Recorded measurements (2)
Dated top-10 holder concentration readings for NaoX Protocol
Date measuredTop 10 holdFlagged
93.5%Yes
93.5%Yes

Each row is an automated measurement taken on the date shown, using public on-chain holder data with burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets excluded. Historical readings describe what our model measured on that date — they are not statements about the project’s conduct then or now, and are not financial advice.

Track NaoX Protocol and 1,700+ other assets

One email when any coin newly crosses our 50% top-10 holder-concentration threshold. No account needed.

Confirmed opt-in, unsubscribe in one click. We don’t sell your data — see our privacy policy.

Frequently asked questions about NaoX Protocol

Is NaoX Protocol a scam?

We do not allege that NaoX Protocol (NAORIS) is a scam, and we have no evidence of wrongdoing by anyone associated with it. What we can tell you is what we measured: Its ten largest private wallets hold 93.5% of supply (exchange, staking, bridge and burn addresses excluded). That places it at 77/100 on our automated scale, which we label extreme risk. A high score means the asset has structural characteristics that have historically preceded losses — not that fraud has occurred. These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public market and on-chain data — not statements of fact, financial advice, or allegations of wrongdoing.

Why is NaoX Protocol flagged as extreme risk?

NaoX Protocol's risk score is driven mainly by: on-chain holder concentration — On-chain: the top 10 holders control 93.5% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — at this level a few wallets hold enough supply to move the price on their own; supply structure — Only 15.0% in free float — most of the supply is not yet circulating, so the price is set by a small share of it and future releases could dilute holders; drawdown from all-time high — Down 81% from its all-time high — a major sustained decline.

Who controls NaoX Protocol's supply?

On-chain data shows the top 10 holders of NaoX Protocol control 93.5% of the supply, after excluding burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets. At that level ten wallets hold enough supply to move the price on their own. This measures holdings, not how any holder has acted.

Is NaoX Protocol safe to buy?

FraudCoins.com does not give buy or sell recommendations, and no cryptocurrency is safe. NaoX Protocol scores 77/100 (extreme risk) on our automated risk model. Always do your own research and never invest more than you can afford to lose.

Learn about these risks

Other coins flagged for similar risks