Is FONQ a scam?
EXTREME RISK · 77/100FONQ (FONQ) has an automated risk score of 77/100 — extreme risk. FONQ has highly concentrated ownership: On-chain: the top 10 holders control 94.5% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — at this level a few wallets hold enough supply to move the price on their own. That is a measurement of who holds the supply, not a finding about how any holder has acted or will act. Near-zero volume (0.28% of MCap) — almost nothing trades, so a position of any size would be hard to sell near the quoted price. Market cap under $100M — mid-sized; large trades can still move the price.
Automated assessment · updated 22 October 2026
FONQ
fonqEXTREME$0.0764
+0.01% (24h)
updating live price…
Risk Assessment
Risk Score
EXTREME RISK
Driven primarily by on-chain holder concentration (22 of 22 points). Every contributing factor is itemised below.
measured 2026-10-22 · 7 factors evaluated
Here is what the public data shows about FONQ, ordered by how strongly each factor contributes to the score:
- On-Chain Holder Concentration: On-chain: the top 10 holders control 94.5% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — at this level a few wallets hold enough supply to move the price on their own.
- Volume Anomaly: Near-zero volume (0.28% of MCap) — almost nothing trades, so a position of any size would be hard to sell near the quoted price.
- Market Cap Risk: Market cap under $100M — mid-sized; large trades can still move the price.
- Drawdown From All-Time High: Down 15% from its all-time high — within normal speculative range.
These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public data — not financial advice or an allegation of wrongdoing. See our methodology.
Why this asset is flagged as high-risk
The patterns below are automated, opinion-based observations from public market data. They describe statistical risk indicators — not proof of wrongdoing by any project or person.
Verified on-chain: after excluding burn and labelled exchange, staking and liquidity wallets (team/vesting contracts are counted), the top 10 holders control more than half of the supply. At that level ten wallets hold enough supply to move the price on their own; this measures holdings, not conduct
Risk Factor Breakdown
Each factor is scored independently and weighted to calculate the total risk score.
Drawdown From All-Time High
Price Action
2/25
8%
How far the price sits below its peak. Deep drawdowns are common to abandoned and post-collapse tokens, but also to assets in a prolonged bear market — on its own this measures price history, not conduct.
Volume Anomaly
Trading Signals
15/20
75%
24-hour volume compared with market cap. Very high turnover can reflect genuine news-driven trading or inflated volume; very low turnover means the price is rarely tested. We measure the ratio and cannot attribute it to any party.
Market Cap Risk
Market Structure
3/15
20%
Market capitalisation. The smaller the asset, the less capital it takes to move its price.
On-Chain Holder Concentration
Tokenomics
22/22
100%
Verified holder data. Burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and LP wallets are excluded; unlabelled contracts (often team/vesting multisigs) are counted. Above the flag threshold, ten wallets hold enough supply to move the price on their own.
Not contributing (3): Supply Structure, Price Volatility, Transparency Gaps — 0 points.
Key Metrics
Protect Yourself
- • Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely
- • Check token concentration — if top 10 wallets hold >50%, be cautious
- • Verify the team is public and doxxed
- • Read the smart contract audit before buying
- • Be wary of unrealistic APY promises
Embed Risk Badge
Writing about this coin? Embed our risk badge — it updates automatically with each scan.
Community Comments
Loading comments…
What the contract allows
Ethereum · measured 2026-10-16
We checked FONQ’s deployed contract for all 7 owner privileges below and found none of them. This describes the code only — it says nothing about the team, the treasury, or how the supply is distributed.
Checked and not present: change any wallet balance, pause all transfers, blacklist wallets, mint new tokens, ownership can be reclaimed after renouncing, contract has a hidden owner, contract can self-destruct.
Source code: published and verified, so the deployed bytecode can be independently reviewed.
Contract analysis from GoPlus Labs · verify on-chain. An upgradeable contract can change after this reading.
How we counted holders here
None of FONQ’s ten largest holders matched a labelled exchange, market-maker, treasury or vesting, liquidity-pool or DeFi-protocol, staking or vault, bridge, multisig or burn address, so the 94.5% we report is simply the plain top-10 share. On many tokens a large share of supply sits in custodial or burn addresses and has to be separated out first; on this one it does not.
Classification applied to the 100 holder records returned for this contract; 97 remained after exclusions · measured 2026-10-22. Custodial wallets are identified by public address labels, so an unlabelled one may still be counted as private — this correction is a floor, not a guarantee.
FONQ holder-concentration history
17 dated measurements · -2 pts over the period
FraudCoins.com has measured the share of FONQ’s supply held by its top 10 non-exchange wallets on 17 days since 31 Jul 2026. The highest reading was 96.5% on 31 Jul 2026; the most recent reading is 94.5% on 22 Oct 2026.
- 10 Oct 2026: Ethereum and Optimism holder lists and wallet labels moved from Moralis to Blockscout, which identifies more exchange, bridge, treasury and vesting wallets.
- 12 Oct 2026: Added contract-type rules (lock-ups, vaults, lending and yield protocols), excluded vault and yield-bearing receipt tokens, and stopped flagging assets where the measured chain holds only part of the supply.
Composite risk score (0–100)
Recorded measurements (17)
| Date measured | Top 10 hold | Flagged |
|---|---|---|
| 94.5% | Yes | |
| 94.5% | Yes | |
| 94.5% | Yes | |
| 94.5% | Yes | |
| 94.5% | Yes | |
| 94.5% | Yes | |
| 94.5% | Yes | |
| 94.5% | Yes | |
| 94.5% | Yes | |
| 94.5% | Yes | |
| 94.5% | Yes | |
| 94.5% | Yes |
Each row is an automated measurement taken on the date shown, using public on-chain holder data with burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets excluded. Historical readings describe what our model measured on that date — they are not statements about the project’s conduct then or now, and are not financial advice.
Track FONQ and 1,700+ other assets
One email when any coin newly crosses our 50% top-10 holder-concentration threshold. No account needed.
Confirmed opt-in, unsubscribe in one click. We don’t sell your data — see our privacy policy.
Frequently asked questions about FONQ
Is FONQ a scam?
We do not allege that FONQ (FONQ) is a scam, and we have no evidence of wrongdoing by anyone associated with it. What we can tell you is what we measured: Its ten largest private wallets hold 94.5% of supply (exchange, staking, bridge and burn addresses excluded). That places it at 77/100 on our automated scale, which we label extreme risk. A high score means the asset has structural characteristics that have historically preceded losses — not that fraud has occurred. These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public market and on-chain data — not statements of fact, financial advice, or allegations of wrongdoing.
Why is FONQ flagged as extreme risk?
FONQ's risk score is driven mainly by: on-chain holder concentration — On-chain: the top 10 holders control 94.5% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — at this level a few wallets hold enough supply to move the price on their own; volume anomaly — Near-zero volume (0.28% of MCap) — almost nothing trades, so a position of any size would be hard to sell near the quoted price; market cap risk — Market cap under $100M — mid-sized; large trades can still move the price.
Who controls FONQ's supply?
On-chain data shows the top 10 holders of FONQ control 94.5% of the supply, after excluding burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets. At that level ten wallets hold enough supply to move the price on their own. This measures holdings, not how any holder has acted.
Is FONQ safe to buy?
FraudCoins.com does not give buy or sell recommendations, and no cryptocurrency is safe. FONQ scores 77/100 (extreme risk) on our automated risk model. Always do your own research and never invest more than you can afford to lose.