FraudCoins.com

Is Brevis a scam?

EXTREME RISK · 77/100

Brevis (BREV) has an automated risk score of 77/100 — extreme risk. Brevis has highly concentrated ownership: On-chain: the top 10 holders control 93.8% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — at this level a few wallets hold enough supply to move the price on their own. That is a measurement of who holds the supply, not a finding about how any holder has acted or will act. Down 87% from its all-time high — anyone who bought at the peak is far underwater. 25.0% circulating (~75% off-market) — a large share is still to be released.

Automated assessment · updated 12 October 2026

Brevis

Brevis

brevEXTREME
Low Free FloatTop-10 Concentration

$0.0756

+0.19% (24h)

updating live price…

Risk Assessment

77/100

Risk Score

EXTREME RISK

Driven primarily by on-chain holder concentration (22 of 22 points). Every contributing factor is itemised below.

measured 2026-10-12 · 7 factors evaluated

Here is what the public data shows about Brevis, ordered by how strongly each factor contributes to the score:

  • On-Chain Holder Concentration: On-chain: the top 10 holders control 93.8% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — at this level a few wallets hold enough supply to move the price on their own.
  • Drawdown From All-Time High: Down 87% from its all-time high — anyone who bought at the peak is far underwater.
  • Supply Structure: 25.0% circulating (~75% off-market) — a large share is still to be released.
  • Market Cap Risk: Market cap under $100M — mid-sized; large trades can still move the price.

These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public data — not financial advice or an allegation of wrongdoing. See our methodology.

Why this asset is flagged as high-risk

The patterns below are automated, opinion-based observations from public market data. They describe statistical risk indicators — not proof of wrongdoing by any project or person.

Low Free Float

A small share of total supply is circulating (estimated from reported supply figures, not from holder data). The price is set by that small share

Top-10 Concentration

Verified on-chain: after excluding burn and labelled exchange, staking and liquidity wallets (team/vesting contracts are counted), the top 10 holders control more than half of the supply. At that level ten wallets hold enough supply to move the price on their own; this measures holdings, not conduct

Risk Factor Breakdown

Each factor is scored independently and weighted to calculate the total risk score.

Drawdown From All-Time High

Price Action

20/25

80%

How far the price sits below its peak. Deep drawdowns are common to abandoned and post-collapse tokens, but also to assets in a prolonged bear market — on its own this measures price history, not conduct.

Finding: Down 87% from its all-time high — anyone who bought at the peak is far underwater

Volume Anomaly

Trading Signals

1/20

5%

24-hour volume compared with market cap. Very high turnover can reflect genuine news-driven trading or inflated volume; very low turnover means the price is rarely tested. We measure the ratio and cannot attribute it to any party.

Finding: Volume at 11.4% of market cap — within normal range

Market Cap Risk

Market Structure

3/15

20%

Market capitalisation. The smaller the asset, the less capital it takes to move its price.

Finding: Market cap under $100M — mid-sized; large trades can still move the price

Supply Structure

Tokenomics

11/20

55%

Free float (circulating vs total/max supply). A low float means much of the supply has yet to reach the market, so the price is set by a small share of it and future releases could dilute holders. Estimated from reported supply; holder data read from the chain is scored separately.

Finding: 25.0% circulating (~75% off-market) — a large share is still to be released

On-Chain Holder Concentration

Tokenomics

22/22

100%

Verified holder data. Burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and LP wallets are excluded; unlabelled contracts (often team/vesting multisigs) are counted. Above the flag threshold, ten wallets hold enough supply to move the price on their own.

Finding: On-chain: the top 10 holders control 93.8% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — at this level a few wallets hold enough supply to move the price on their own

Not contributing (2): Price Volatility, Transparency Gaps — 0 points.

Key Metrics

Market Cap$18.89M
24h Volume$2.16M
Vol / MCap11.4%
All-Time High$0.5601
ATH Drop-86.51%
ATH Date9 months ago
Circulating Supply250.00M
Total Supply1.00B
Max Supply1.00B
7d Change—
30d Change—

Protect Yourself

  • • Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely
  • • Check token concentration — if top 10 wallets hold >50%, be cautious
  • • Verify the team is public and doxxed
  • • Read the smart contract audit before buying
  • • Be wary of unrealistic APY promises
Full Guide: How to Spot Scams →

Embed Risk Badge

Writing about this coin? Embed our risk badge — it updates automatically with each scan.

FraudCoins risk badge preview

Community Comments

Be respectful. Comments are public and reflect users’ own opinions, not FraudCoins.

Loading comments…

What the contract allows

Ethereum · measured 2026-10-21

Brevis’s deployed contract grants its owner 1 privilege that can affect your position. These are properties of the code itself, not allegations about anyone’s conduct — many legitimate projects retain them deliberately.

  • Owner can mint new tokens

    Supply is not fixed; new tokens can be created, diluting existing holders.

Checked and not present: change any wallet balance, pause all transfers, blacklist wallets, ownership can be reclaimed after renouncing, contract has a hidden owner, contract can self-destruct.

Source code: published and verified, so the deployed bytecode can be independently reviewed.

Contract analysis from GoPlus Labs · verify on-chain. An upgradeable contract can change after this reading.

How we counted holders here

Ten largest wallets

97.1%

including custodial

Largest private wallets

93.8%

after excluding 5

5 of Brevis’s ten largest holders are labelled exchange, market-maker, treasury or vesting, liquidity-pool or DeFi-protocol, staking or vault, bridge, multisig or burn addresses — supply that is custodied, pooled or destroyed rather than sitting in one person’s wallet. Separating them out moves the top-10 figure by 3.3 points. We report the private-wallet figure because that is the supply someone can actually choose to sell today.

Wallets excluded from the top 10

AddressClassified asLabelShare
0x7510…bae1Staking or vault contractCeler Network: Original Token Vault V2 · Celer Network: Original Token Vault V2 · Celer Network · Ori1.98%
0xa48d…c9c7Burn addressMerkleDistributorWithDeadline · MerkleDistributorWithDeadline · MerkleDistributorWithDeadlin0.91%
0xf977…acecExchange walletBinance · Binance: Hot Wallet 20 · HOT WALLET · Exchange · Binance 8 ·0.83%
0x28c6…1d60Exchange walletBinance · Binance: Hot Wallet · HOT WALLET · Exchange · Binance 14 · B0.37%
0x91d4…debeExchange walletOKX 193 · Exchange · OKX 1930.36%

Classification applied to the 100 holder records returned for this contract; 72 remained after exclusions · measured 2026-10-12. Custodial wallets are identified by public address labels, so an unlabelled one may still be counted as private — this correction is a floor, not a guarantee.

Brevis holder-concentration history

2 dated measurements · -1.8 pts over the period

FraudCoins.com has measured the share of Brevis’s supply held by its top 10 non-exchange wallets on 2 days since 11 Oct 2026. The highest reading was 95.6% on 11 Oct 2026; the most recent reading is 93.8% on 12 Oct 2026.

Method note. How we classify wallets changed during this series. A step on these dates reflects re-classification, not a movement of tokens, so readings before and after are not like-for-like.
  • 12 Oct 2026: Added contract-type rules (lock-ups, vaults, lending and yield protocols), excluded vault and yield-bearing receipt tokens, and stopped flagging assets where the measured chain holds only part of the supply.
10050050% flag threshold2026-10-112026-10-12

Composite risk score (0–100)

1005002026-07-292026-10-22
Recorded measurements (2)
Dated top-10 holder concentration readings for Brevis
Date measuredTop 10 holdFlagged
93.8%Yes
95.6%Yes

Each row is an automated measurement taken on the date shown, using public on-chain holder data with burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets excluded. Historical readings describe what our model measured on that date — they are not statements about the project’s conduct then or now, and are not financial advice.

Track Brevis and 1,700+ other assets

One email when any coin newly crosses our 50% top-10 holder-concentration threshold. No account needed.

Confirmed opt-in, unsubscribe in one click. We don’t sell your data — see our privacy policy.

Frequently asked questions about Brevis

Is Brevis a scam?

We do not allege that Brevis (BREV) is a scam, and we have no evidence of wrongdoing by anyone associated with it. What we can tell you is what we measured: Its ten largest private wallets hold 93.8% of supply (exchange, staking, bridge and burn addresses excluded). That places it at 77/100 on our automated scale, which we label extreme risk. A high score means the asset has structural characteristics that have historically preceded losses — not that fraud has occurred. These are automated, opinion-based indicators from public market and on-chain data — not statements of fact, financial advice, or allegations of wrongdoing.

Why is Brevis flagged as extreme risk?

Brevis's risk score is driven mainly by: on-chain holder concentration — On-chain: the top 10 holders control 93.8% of supply (burn and labelled exchange/staking/LP wallets excluded; team/vesting contracts counted) — at this level a few wallets hold enough supply to move the price on their own; drawdown from all-time high — Down 87% from its all-time high — anyone who bought at the peak is far underwater; supply structure — 25.0% circulating (~75% off-market) — a large share is still to be released.

Who controls Brevis's supply?

On-chain data shows the top 10 holders of Brevis control 93.8% of the supply, after excluding burn and labelled exchange, staking, bridge and liquidity wallets. At that level ten wallets hold enough supply to move the price on their own. This measures holdings, not how any holder has acted.

Is Brevis safe to buy?

FraudCoins.com does not give buy or sell recommendations, and no cryptocurrency is safe. Brevis scores 77/100 (extreme risk) on our automated risk model. Always do your own research and never invest more than you can afford to lose.

Learn about these risks

Other coins flagged for similar risks