https://fraudcoins.com/ Cryptocurrencies above our supply-concentration threshold in the most recent on-chain holder scan (2026-10-22). Each item carries its measurement date. Automated, opinion-based — not financial advice. en Thu, 22 Oct 2026 05:06:25 GMT https://fraudcoins.com/coins/fonq/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/fonq/ Thu, 22 Oct 2026 04:53:17 GMT FONQ (FONQ) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-22: the top 10 holders held 94.5% of supply ($53M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/metal-blockchain/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/metal-blockchain/ Thu, 22 Oct 2026 04:53:00 GMT Metal Blockchain (METAL) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-22: the top 10 holders held 99.7% of supply ($53M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/altlayer/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/altlayer/ Thu, 22 Oct 2026 04:52:53 GMT AltLayer (ALT) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-22: the top 10 holders held 86.9% of supply ($89M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/adi-token/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/adi-token/ Thu, 22 Oct 2026 04:52:25 GMT ADI (ADI) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-22: the top 10 holders held 98.2% of supply ($77M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/flying-tulip/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/flying-tulip/ Thu, 22 Oct 2026 04:52:12 GMT Flying Tulip (FT) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-22: the top 10 holders held 97.9% of supply ($68M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/espresso/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/espresso/ Thu, 22 Oct 2026 04:52:05 GMT Espresso (ESP) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-22: the top 10 holders held 55.8% of supply ($63M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/prometeus/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/prometeus/ Thu, 22 Oct 2026 04:51:52 GMT Prom (PROM) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-22: the top 10 holders held 55.6% of supply ($107M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/sosovalue/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/sosovalue/ Thu, 22 Oct 2026 04:51:42 GMT SoSoValue (SOSO) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-22: the top 10 holders held 91.8% of supply ($103M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/humanity/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/humanity/ Thu, 22 Oct 2026 04:51:29 GMT Humanity (H) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-22: the top 10 holders held 81.8% of supply ($122M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/sentient/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/sentient/ Thu, 22 Oct 2026 04:51:21 GMT Sentient (SENT) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-22: the top 10 holders held 81.9% of supply ($164M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/instadapp/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/instadapp/ Thu, 22 Oct 2026 04:51:06 GMT Fluid (FLUID) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-22: the top 10 holders held 55.1% of supply ($201M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/shuffle-2/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/shuffle-2/ Thu, 22 Oct 2026 04:50:56 GMT Shuffle (SHFL) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-22: the top 10 holders held 86.1% of supply ($250M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/kite-2/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/kite-2/ Thu, 22 Oct 2026 04:50:49 GMT Kite (KITE) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-22: the top 10 holders held 66.9% of supply ($286M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/pieverse/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/pieverse/ Thu, 22 Oct 2026 04:50:41 GMT Pieverse (PIEVERSE) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-22: the top 10 holders held 83.2% of supply ($287M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/unibase/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/unibase/ Thu, 22 Oct 2026 04:50:31 GMT Unibase (UB) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-22: the top 10 holders held 80.2% of supply ($329M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/space-id/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/space-id/ Wed, 21 Oct 2026 04:12:18 GMT SPACE ID (ID) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-21: the top 10 holders held 80.2% of supply ($50M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/janction/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/janction/ Wed, 21 Oct 2026 04:12:03 GMT Janction (JCT) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-21: the top 10 holders held 100.0% of supply ($50M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/robo-token-2/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/robo-token-2/ Wed, 14 Oct 2026 04:15:53 GMT Fabric Protocol (ROBO) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-14: the top 10 holders held 81.5% of supply ($14M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/deapcoin/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/deapcoin/ Wed, 14 Oct 2026 04:15:50 GMT DEAPCOIN (DEP) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-14: the top 10 holders held 80.9% of supply ($29M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/atoshi/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/atoshi/ Wed, 14 Oct 2026 04:15:48 GMT Atoshi (ATOS) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-14: the top 10 holders held 98.2% of supply ($35M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/status/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/status/ Wed, 14 Oct 2026 04:15:42 GMT Status (SNT) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-14: the top 10 holders held 78.4% of supply ($35M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/apriori/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/apriori/ Tue, 13 Oct 2026 04:18:21 GMT Capricorn (APR) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-13: the top 10 holders held 94.0% of supply ($8M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/ravedao/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/ravedao/ Tue, 13 Oct 2026 04:18:19 GMT RaveDAO (RAVE) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-13: the top 10 holders held 95.9% of supply ($41M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/opcode/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/opcode/ Tue, 13 Oct 2026 04:18:10 GMT Opcode (OPCODE) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-13: the top 10 holders held 90.1% of supply ($36M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/mocaverse/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/mocaverse/ Tue, 13 Oct 2026 04:18:03 GMT Moca Network (MOCA) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-13: the top 10 holders held 77.1% of supply ($35M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/matrix-6/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/matrix-6/ Tue, 13 Oct 2026 04:17:59 GMT Matrix (MTX) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-13: the top 10 holders held 90.2% of supply ($28M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/peoples-reserve-network/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/peoples-reserve-network/ Tue, 13 Oct 2026 04:17:58 GMT Peoples Reserve (PRN) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-13: the top 10 holders held 76.9% of supply ($13M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/baseline/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/baseline/ Tue, 13 Oct 2026 04:17:56 GMT Baseline (B) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-13: the top 10 holders held 99.6% of supply ($39M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/lombard-protocol/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/lombard-protocol/ Tue, 13 Oct 2026 04:17:44 GMT Lombard (BARD) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-13: the top 10 holders held 80.2% of supply ($43M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/billions-network/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/billions-network/ Tue, 13 Oct 2026 04:17:38 GMT Billions Network (BILL) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-13: the top 10 holders held 88.6% of supply ($16M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/ethgas-2/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/ethgas-2/ Tue, 13 Oct 2026 04:17:34 GMT ETHGas (GWEI) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-13: the top 10 holders held 95.3% of supply ($40M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/interfold/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/interfold/ Tue, 13 Oct 2026 04:17:29 GMT The Interfold (FOLD) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-13: the top 10 holders held 74.7% of supply ($16M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/orochi-network/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/orochi-network/ Tue, 13 Oct 2026 04:17:27 GMT Orochi Network (ON) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-13: the top 10 holders held 84.2% of supply ($18M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/uquid-coin/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/uquid-coin/ Tue, 13 Oct 2026 04:17:23 GMT Uquid Coin (UQC) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-13: the top 10 holders held 97.5% of supply ($28M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/ai-analysis-token/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/ai-analysis-token/ Tue, 13 Oct 2026 04:17:21 GMT AI Analysis Token (AIAT) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-13: the top 10 holders held 98.7% of supply ($46M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/zerobase/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/zerobase/ Tue, 13 Oct 2026 04:17:12 GMT ZEROBASE (ZBT) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-13: the top 10 holders held 96.9% of supply ($23M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/usualx/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/usualx/ Tue, 13 Oct 2026 04:17:03 GMT USUALx (USUALX) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-13: the top 10 holders held 89.0% of supply ($10M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/pentagon-chain/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/pentagon-chain/ Tue, 13 Oct 2026 04:16:38 GMT Pentagon Chain (PC) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-13: the top 10 holders held 80.9% of supply ($45M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/infinit/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/infinit/ Mon, 12 Oct 2026 07:44:54 GMT INFINIT (IN) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-12: the top 10 holders held 70.6% of supply ($10M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/eurocoinpay/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/eurocoinpay/ Mon, 12 Oct 2026 07:44:52 GMT EurocoinToken (ECTE) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-12: the top 10 holders held 98.8% of supply ($11M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/opinion/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/opinion/ Mon, 12 Oct 2026 07:44:49 GMT Opinion (OPN) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-12: the top 10 holders held 98.4% of supply ($10M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/alethea-artificial-liquid-intelligence-token/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/alethea-artificial-liquid-intelligence-token/ Mon, 12 Oct 2026 07:44:47 GMT Artificial Liquid Intelligence (ALI) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-12: the top 10 holders held 75.6% of supply ($12M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/hairdao/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/hairdao/ Mon, 12 Oct 2026 07:44:46 GMT HairDAO (HAIR) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-12: the top 10 holders held 79.4% of supply ($13M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/caldera/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/caldera/ Mon, 12 Oct 2026 07:44:44 GMT Caldera (ERA) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-12: the top 10 holders held 91.0% of supply ($13M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/lagrange/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/lagrange/ Mon, 12 Oct 2026 07:44:42 GMT Lagrange (LA) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-12: the top 10 holders held 80.5% of supply ($20M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/chili-coin/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/chili-coin/ Mon, 12 Oct 2026 07:44:39 GMT Chili Coin (CHI) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-12: the top 10 holders held 95.0% of supply ($14M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/fluent-network/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/fluent-network/ Mon, 12 Oct 2026 07:44:37 GMT Fluent (BLEND) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-12: the top 10 holders held 95.3% of supply ($10M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/debox/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/debox/ Mon, 12 Oct 2026 07:44:36 GMT DeBox (BOX) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-12: the top 10 holders held 70.4% of supply ($12M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/liquid-mercury/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/liquid-mercury/ Mon, 12 Oct 2026 07:44:34 GMT Liquid Mercury (MERC) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-12: the top 10 holders held 70.8% of supply ($14M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice. https://fraudcoins.com/coins/tribe-2/ https://fraudcoins.com/coins/tribe-2/ Mon, 12 Oct 2026 07:44:33 GMT Tribe (TRIBE) was above our holder-concentration threshold when measured on 2026-10-12: the top 10 holders held 98.8% of supply ($14M market cap, eth; exchange, market-maker, treasury/vesting, liquidity-pool, staking, bridge, multisig and burn wallets excluded). Automated, opinion-based assessment — not financial advice.